Saturday, January 03, 2009
Laws with unintended consequences
Last August, HR4040 was quietly signed into law. Known as the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act, it has the laudable aim of ensuring the safety of all toys, clothing, and other products marketed to children under age 12. In pursuit of this, it requires third party lead testing of every single product meant for children, no matter the components used to make the product and no matter the size of the business.

The unintended consequence is that I, and thousands of other artisans, will be forced out of business. HR4040 requires that every baby carrier, blanket, or burp cloth that I make be tested for lead, at a cost of about $4000 per item. Since my items are all one-of-a-kind, I can't pay a one-time fee to get a sling tested, I would have to pay it for every sling.

According to the US Consumer Product Safety Commission's website,

All children’s products (as defined by the CPSIA) subject to the lead limit of the Act will eventually require testing for lead, not just those with surface coatings.

Children’s products manufactured after February 10, 2009, when the lead limit may not exceed 600 ppm, will need a general conformity certification based on a test of the product or a reasonable testing program for products after that date. Children’s products manufactured after August 14, 2009, when the lead limit may not exceed 300 ppm, will have to be certified based on third-party testing of the product by accredited third party laboratories after that date.

For those of us who are sole proprietors or have just a few employees, hand-crafting our items, it is simply not possible to conform to the requirements of this law.

It is tempting to think "I'm a little guy - they'll never even notice me" and ignore it. But built into HR4040 are strong deterrents to this thinking: $100,000 fines per violation and up to five years in prison. Sure, they might not notice me. But if they did? It isn't a risk worth taking.

The unintended consequences go farther than just putting me and other artisans out of business. The LA Times online posted an article yesterday detailing the results of the law on thrift stores:

Barring a reprieve, regulations set to take effect next month could force thousands of clothing retailers and thrift stores to throw away trunkloads of children's clothing.

The law, aimed at keeping lead-filled merchandise away from children, mandates that all products sold for those age 12 and younger -- including clothing -- be tested for lead and phthalates, which are chemicals used to make plastics more pliable. Those that haven't been tested will be considered hazardous, regardless of whether they actually contain lead. (Emphasis mine.)

I think that the people who drafted, supported, passed, and signed this law had the best of intentions. But it is written far too broadly and without thought for the unintended results. It is in desperate need of amendment.

The Handmade Toy Alliance is working towards that goal. You can join their group on Facebook, and they have written a sample letter that you can use. Etsy has an open letter regarding the CPSIA. You can contact your congressional representatives and senators, as well as the Small Business Ombudsman.

I also strongly recommend writing to Representative Bobby Rush, the sponsor of the bill. If you are an artisan, you might like to send a small handmade children's item to him, along with a letter explaining your opposition to the bill and pointing out that the item you have sent will be considered "hazardous material" as of February 10th.

HR4040 is already law. We can't change that now, but we can cause our representatives to take another look at the repercussions of the law and consider the need for amendments.

So please, if you care about handmade toys for your little ones, or the availability of thrift store clothing for children, or have a friend who (like me) is about to lose their business, take a few minutes and write your representatives. It matters.

Save Handmade Toys

posted at 4:32 PM  
3 comments



3 Comments:
At 10:00 PM, Blogger Amber said...

Oh wow - our congress critters at work. *sigh*

I think I like it better when they just bicker and don't manage to get anything done.

I'll certainly write some letters - this is ridiculous!

(So says a woman who is currently shopping for light figures and having to having to spend about 50% more on some of them because the CA congress critters have decided that fluorescents are the greatest thing ever, despite their expense, mercury content, and complicated disposal requirements)

 
At 1:22 AM, Blogger Ma Torg said...

That is about one of the dumbest things I've heard of. Thank you, bureaucracy...speedy laws are always better than carefully thought out ones...cough...cough

 
At 3:05 PM, Blogger Jessica said...

Just emailed both our senators and my rep.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home



About Emily
I'm a wife, a mother, a teacher of four growing, every-changing little boys. I'm a follower of Christ in the Anglican tradition. I love to read, sew, garden, and read some more. I'm a doula, a choral director, and a composer. I'm an introvert, I miss silence, and I sometimes dream of running off to a convent. My husband understands this better than most - he dreams of running off to a monastery. Introverted solitaries raising four rambunctious little boys - it's a wonderful life!


Family & Friends
  • Amie
  • Bethany
  • Gabe
  • Jenn
  • Life in the Slow Lane
  • Lindsay
  • SarahMarie
  • Torgusborg

  • Mothering
  • an undercurrent of hostility
  • Homemaking through the Church Year
  • Like Mother, Like Daughter

  • Causes

    say their names



    Muse Mama


    Birth
  • Better Birth
  • pushedbirth
  • Nursing Birth
  • VBAC Facts
  • The Business of Being Born

  • Recent Entries
    Three boys
    CVS trip 12/28
    I don't believe it.
    Help me rescue my budget?
    Julie Andrews - age 12
    Slashed prices
    Do you know what CAUSES that?
    CVS again
    CVS trip
    Things we've been doing

    Archives
    April 2005
    May 2005
    June 2005
    July 2005
    August 2005
    September 2005
    October 2005
    November 2005
    December 2005
    January 2006
    February 2006
    March 2006
    April 2006
    May 2006
    June 2006
    July 2006
    August 2006
    September 2006
    October 2006
    November 2006
    December 2006
    January 2007
    February 2007
    March 2007
    April 2007
    May 2007
    June 2007
    July 2007
    August 2007
    September 2007
    October 2007
    November 2007
    December 2007
    January 2008
    February 2008
    March 2008
    April 2008
    May 2008
    June 2008
    July 2008
    August 2008
    September 2008
    October 2008
    November 2008
    December 2008
    January 2009
    February 2009
    March 2009
    April 2009
    May 2009
    June 2009
    July 2009
    August 2009
    September 2009
    October 2009
    November 2009
    December 2009
    January 2010
    February 2010
    March 2010
    April 2010
    May 2010
    June 2010
    July 2010
    August 2010
    September 2010
    October 2010
    November 2010
    December 2010
    January 2011
    February 2011
    March 2011
    April 2011
    May 2011
    June 2011
    July 2011
    August 2011
    September 2011
    October 2011
    November 2011
    December 2011
    January 2012
    February 2012
    March 2012
    April 2012
    May 2012
    June 2012
    August 2012
    September 2012
    October 2012
    December 2012
    January 2013
    March 2013
    August 2013
    November 2013
    January 2014
    February 2014
    April 2014

    Credits
    Blog Design by:


    Image from:
    istockphoto

    Powered by: